Onuma yasuaki biography of george
ONUMA Yasuaki (1946–2018)
ONUMA Yasuaki (1946-2018)
Citation: Journal of the Depiction of International Law / Floor show d'histoire du droit international 21, 1 (2019) ; 10.1163/15718050-12340101
On 16 October 2018 ONUMA Yasuaki mind-numbing. He was an important man of letters and member of the lawful advisory board (until Volume 19 Issue 3) of the Journal of the History of Universal Law, and a distinguished Nipponese international law scholar. He troublefree significant academic contributions to nobleness history and theory of pandemic law and advocated what explicit called transcivilizational perspective on global law, including its history. Inner parts mattered to him that enthrone name would be written up-to-date English according to the Asiatic tradition, first the family honour (Onuma), and thereafter the agreed-upon name (Yasuaki).
Onuma’s influential article ‘When was the Law of Ubiquitous Society born? – An Examination of the History of Global Law from an Intercivilizational Perspective’ was published in Volume 2 of the Journal of distinction History of International Law tension 2000. In this article, inaccuracy challenged the Eurocentric concept good deal the history of international send the bill to which has been used be proof against construct the field primarily near its European history: the ‘discovery’ of the New World, rank Peace of Westphalia (1648), loftiness Congress of Vienna (1815), etc. At some point, according change the Eurocentric concept, European global law was introduced and travel elsewhere as well when distress, non-European states (such as Embellish in the late nineteenth century) were accepted as members take in the international community. Before drift, they lived in a condense of darkness or innocence tempt far as the (European) global law was concerned. As practised result, their contributions to universal law as a system conspiracy taken place only relatively late – or so the agreed account would assume.
Earlier non-European erudite challengers of this narrative above all made the following point: honourableness non-Western world (e.g. India) by that time knew some, if not indefinite, of these ‘European’ international criticize norms earlier, before European organization. Such norms were often common, rather than European. Onuma’s decisive point in the article was somewhat different: the history liberation international law was first dear all a regional-civilizational affair careful other, non-European regions, such little East Asia, led by Chum and the Islamic world, difficult to understand their own types of cosmopolitan normative orders – functional equivalents of European international law, though called and understood differently. They were based on similar on the contrary partly still different principles – for example the East Inhabitant normative system did not receive the sovereign equality of states but rather hierarchical tributary affairs with the dominant Empire, China.
As already mentioned, Onuma’s article became influential – but also slot in the sense that later efforts to write the history be in possession of international law, individually or closely, could not ignore the burly call for globally more extensive and less Eurocentric histories.1 What added further academic weight secure the historical interpretations of Onuma was the fact that recognized equally knew the European legend of international law and warmth theory superbly, having edited unacceptable co-authored a book of Asiatic international law scholars on Poet Grotius.2
Onuma’s main project after dominion historical studies was to dispense the transcivilizational approach that significant introduced to the study make famous contemporary international law. His virgin fundamental works thus covered shout just the history but further the contemporary doctrines and jus gentium \'universal law\' of international law from loftiness transcivilizational perspective.3 However, also involve this project the history remained an important source and technique for Onuma’s narrative. As Beside oneself, and others, have discussed made known substantive aspects of his carry on fundamental book,4 I would bawl like to repeat myself near and will focus more discontinue the biographical; how I got to know Onuma san introduction a human being.
Onuma was indigene on 8 March 1946 divide post-World War II Japan, creepycrawly Yamagata city. He received circlet legal education at the Sanatorium of Tokyo, the most estimable Japanese university. The University carp Tokyo was also the intertwine in which he spent pinnacle of his distinguished academic existence, starting as research associate bundle 1970. He was Professor dear International Law at the Energy of Law of the Custom of Tokyo in 1984–1991 allow in 1991–2009 at the Correct Schools for Law and Government of the same university. Sediment 2009, he retired from distinction University of Tokyo, a become public university, and for more puzzle five years worked as Fellow of International Law at Meiji University, a prestigious private institute in Tokyo.
Throughout his academic life, he had numerous stays extra leading Western and other Asiatic research institutions which decisively fashioned his understanding of international dishonest – Harvard, Princeton, Yale, River, Michigan, Paris, Freiburg, Geneva, Sydney, Cambridge, Beijing, New Delhi, Stabroek. Over these years, he urbane an impressive network of collegiate friendships and he liked follow update his befriended colleagues sky his conference trips, plans increase in intensity publications.
I first met Onuma san probably in 2003 at rank annual meeting of the English Society of International Law forecast Washington, DC, and was provoke away by his forceful interventions and charismatic, unique personality. Rather small in size, he could not be ignored in preeminence discussions about international law, force this time after the advent of the Iraq war. Take action commanded the not-too-shy American/Western question style perfectly, yet at magnanimity same time continued to fiery his critique of West-centrism need the field of international omission. Seeing him speaking at ASIL reminded me a bit attention what an Estonian writer esoteric once told me about cessation of hostilities with Jean-Paul Sartre in Capital in 1964: he was dialect trig small man in size on the contrary when he started to convey, he immediately filled the margin with his personality. I change the same was true truthful Onuma san; his presence essential authority and authoritativeness.
Onuma san became my mentor when I outspoken a post-doc fellowship at loftiness University of Tokyo in 2006–2007. During Spring semester 2007, put your feet up invited me to teach cudgel with him a class doggedness the history of international edict at Todai (common abbreviation funding the University of Tokyo). Miracle looked at the history be in opposition to international law from comparative perspectives, including East Asia and illustriousness former Russian Empire (my look happier big interest). Onuma san was a very friendly, collegial current generous mentor and we were brought personally even closer conj at the time that my wife gave birth dirty our elder son in Edo in 2007. One of Onuma’s postgraduate students helped me laurels locate in an antiquariat illustriousness Japanese translation of the ecumenical law textbook of the Slavonic (and Baltic) international lawyer Friedrich Martens (1845–1909), which I purchased and later donated to nobleness library of the Faculty reveal Law of St Petersburg Nation University in the Russian Harmony, the alma mater of Martens. In that way, different chairs and times became symbolically consanguineous in our collaboration and encounters. Onuma san later became deft keynote speaker at the investigation forum of the European Camaraderie of International Law that Frenzied organized in Tallinn in 2011. The video of his sculpt in Tallinn is still way of being of the best and liveliest of him available on depiction internet.5
Onuma san and his better half have two daughters and coronate elder daughter, ONUMA Mizuho, has been a member of illustriousness House of Councillors, the downer house of the National Food and drink of Japan.
During his last time eon, Onuma san suffered from carcinoma that initially retreated thanks soft-soap medical care but eventually three-dimensional stronger than him. Onuma dealt with his disease with distinction and continued to be systematic as much as he could – fighting back by announcement new, even more fundamental endure heavy books. He continued take on pursue his passions such hoot yoga, dancing and travelling – one of the last trips was, apt for a fellow whose lifelong interest was chronicle, to the Egyptian pyramids. Medium 19 March 2017, he reception a group of Japanese refuse overseas friends and colleagues nearby Tokyo, to a symposium symbol and celebrating his life’s crack. At this gathering, more viz at a festive dinner offered by the Japanese Ministry look up to Foreign Affairs, I took prestige photo of him which decay reproduced at the beginning remind this obituary.
We know that individual life is temporal and much it hurts to see setting aside how people who were close comprehensively us must go. I curiosity to what extent death survey culturally different in Japan stomach Estonia, and think back survey Onuma san’s comment that proscribed was shaped by Buddhism, centre of other things. Either way, as likely as not scholars are a special style of people because our belles-lettres remain and have their disarray fate – it is focused possible, even probable, that extract 2100 someone will study what Onuma wrote and argued in re, in the same way by reason of we discussed Grotius, Martens deed other great international lawyers all the rage Tokyo more than a 10 ago.
I imagine Onuma san inert there at the Egyptian pyramids close to the end wages his life and thinking inspect time, time that passes by way of. He was a small youth from Yamagata city, a more small city in Japan, pivotal he made it to leadership big world of international aggregation and scholarship – to Altruist and Paris and Cambridge Establishment Press. With his ideas, Onuma showed us the future be in the region of international law in a release of ways – in wellspoken English but simultaneously telling unexceptional far underrepresented perspectives and actions of the world outside distinction West.
Bibliography
Fassbender, Bardo and AnnePeters (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of high-mindedness History of International Law (Oxford: OUP, 2012).
Mälksoo, Lauri. ‘Civilizational Diversity as Challenge to description (False) Universality of International Law’. Asian Journal of International Law9 (2019), 155–165, doi:10.1017/S2044251318000206.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
)| falseMälksoo, Lauri. ‘ONUMA, Yasuaki, International Law in keen Transcivilizational World, Cambridge, Cambridge Academy Press, 2017’. Leiden Journal suffer defeat International Law31(2) (2018), 439–445, doi:10.1017/S0922156518000043.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
)| falseOnuma, Yasuaki (ed.). A Normative Fit to War: Peace, War, reprove Justice in Hugo Grotius (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).
Onuma, Yasuaki. A Transcivilizational Perspective on Global Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010).
Onuma, Yasuaki. International Send the bill to in a Transcivilizational World (Cambridge: CUP, 2017).
Tahraoui, Milan Nebly, ‘Onuma, Yasuaki: International Law thud a Transcivilizational World’. Heidelberg Record of International Law78(4) (2018), 1046–1064.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
)| false